# AI for PlanetTogether APS: Explain the Schedule, Compare Scenarios, Reconcile with the ERP > Source: https://netray.co/erp-ai/planettogether-aps-ai-integration > Publisher: Netray (netray.co), AI and integration engineering for ERP and manufacturing systems. > Section: AI for ERP ## Short answer AI for PlanetTogether adds a private, grounded assistant next to the APS so planners can ask why a job moved, which scenario protects a due date, and where the ERP and the schedule disagree. It reads scheduling data and ERP data through governed connectors, shows the query behind each answer, and leaves the optimizer itself and any publish step under planner control. ## Kind platform ## Erp Family mfg-systems ## Erp Products - PlanetTogether ## Industries - Manufacturing - Process Manufacturing - Aerospace - Electronics ## Region Global ## Persona Production Planner ## Eyebrow PlanetTogether + private AI ## Intro PlanetTogether sits between the ERP and the shop floor. The ERP holds sales orders, production orders, routings and inventory; PlanetTogether imports that demand, builds a finite-capacity schedule with its optimization rules, and the planner publishes the result back or hands it to the floor. The planner lives inside scenarios: a live plan, a what-if for a rush order, a version with an extra shift, and a baseline for comparison. The hard part of the job is rarely pressing Optimize. It is answering the questions that follow. Why did this job slip two days since yesterday? Which resource is the real constraint this week? Which late sales orders trace back to the same missing component? Is the ERP due date still reachable under the scenario the plant manager prefers? Those answers sit across the schedule, the imported ERP data, and the planner's memory of what rules were bent for which customer. PlanetTogether's own features cover much of the visual and rule-driven side well, and many planners never need more. A private AI layer earns its place when the questions are explanatory and cross-system, when the plan must be reconciled against live ERP or MES data, and when the manufacturer cannot send order, customer or routing data to a public AI service because of contracts or export control. This page describes what AI around PlanetTogether realistically does, how it connects, and the questions to put to any vendor before an AI agent gets near your scheduling data. It does not replace the optimizer. The schedule remains the output of PlanetTogether's own logic, and the AI explains, compares and flags. ## Pain Points ### Schedule changes are hard to explain **Detail:** After a re-optimization, dozens of activities may have moved. Planners spend real time reconstructing why, then relay it to sales and production managers by email or chat, often from memory. ### Scenario sprawl **Detail:** Copies of the live scenario for rush orders, overtime and maintenance windows pile up. Comparing two scenarios on late jobs, setup time and resource load is possible but slow, so people compare fewer options than they should. ### ERP and plan drift apart **Detail:** Between imports, production orders are released, quantities change and routings are edited. The plan on screen and the ERP no longer agree, and finding the exact differences means exports and spreadsheets. ### Tribal knowledge in the rules **Detail:** Optimization rules, resource capabilities, setup matrices and custom fields carry years of decisions. When the one planner who understands them is away, nobody can say why a job was sequenced behind another. ### Scheduling data is sensitive **Detail:** Orders, customer names, lead times and routings reveal your business. Defense and aerospace programs often forbid copying that data into a public AI tool. ## Use Cases ### Schedule change explanation **Description:** After an optimize run or an import, the assistant compares the previous and current scenario and explains the biggest movements: a resource went down, a material was marked late, a higher-priority job was inserted. **Erp Objects:** Jobs, Manufacturing Orders, Operations, Activities, Resources, Scenario history **Outcome:** Turns a half-hour reconstruction before the daily production meeting into a short reviewable summary the planner confirms. ### Scenario comparison **Description:** Ask which of three what-if scenarios has the fewest late jobs, the lowest total setup time and the least overtime, and see the numbers side by side with the jobs that differ. **Erp Objects:** Scenarios, Jobs, Resources, Capacity Intervals, Setup data **Outcome:** Lets planners evaluate more alternatives per decision, with the evidence visible rather than recalled. ### Late order root cause **Description:** For each late sales order, trace through the job, operations, bottleneck resource and material availability to state the likely cause in plain language. **Erp Objects:** Sales Orders, Jobs, Operations, Inventory, Purchase Orders **Outcome:** Gives sales a defensible reason and a realistic date, and shows the planner which constraint is worth fixing. ### ERP versus plan reconciliation **Description:** Compare released production orders and quantities in the ERP with the imported manufacturing orders in the schedule and list the differences with the likely reason. **Erp Objects:** ERP production orders, BoM, routing, Manufacturing Orders, import tables **Outcome:** Catches stale or duplicated orders earlier, before the floor works to an outdated plan. ### Constraint and capacity Q&A **Description:** Natural-language questions such as which resource is above 95 percent loaded next week, or what an extra shift on a given resource would pull in. **Erp Objects:** Resources, Capacity Intervals, Departments, Plants, Activities **Outcome:** Moves capacity conversations from screenshots to answers tied to the scenario. ### Planner knowledge capture **Description:** Index optimization rule settings, capabilities, setup matrices and planner notes so a new planner can ask why a resource is restricted or why a customer's jobs get priority. **Erp Objects:** Optimization rules, Capabilities, Custom fields, planner notes **Outcome:** Shortens onboarding and reduces dependence on one experienced planner. ### Shop-floor status summary **Description:** Combine schedule dispatch lists with ERP or MES completion data so a supervisor can ask what is behind on a line this shift and what is next. **Erp Objects:** Dispatch lists, Activities, ERP shop-floor transactions, MES events **Outcome:** Reduces trips to the planner's desk for routine status questions. ## Architecture **Overview:** The AI layer reads from PlanetTogether data and the ERP through governed, read-only connectors. It answers questions and drafts explanations; it does not run the optimizer or publish a schedule on its own. **Layers:** #### Scheduling and ERP connectors **Detail:** Reads schedule data from the PlanetTogether database or its export and import interfaces, and ERP data through the ERP's API or a read replica, with a scoped service account. #### Semantic layer **Detail:** Maps jobs, manufacturing orders, operations, resources, capabilities and scenario names to the terms your planners use, including custom fields added during implementation. #### Model serving **Detail:** An open-weight model (Llama, Qwen, Mistral or gpt-oss class) served with vLLM or Ollama on customer GPUs or a private cloud, sized for planner-scale concurrency. #### Retrieval and agents **Detail:** Retrieval over live data and planner documentation grounds each answer; any suggested action, such as an adjusted priority, is a proposal a planner approves in PlanetTogether itself. #### Governance and audit **Detail:** Every question, query and answer is logged against the requesting user. Customer and program data stay inside your boundary. ## Deployment Options ### Air-gapped on-prem **Fit:** Defense, aerospace and electronics plants whose customer contracts forbid external AI services. **Detail:** Model, retrieval and connectors run on customer hardware beside the scheduling server with no outbound path. ### Private or sovereign cloud **Fit:** Manufacturers already hosting PlanetTogether and the ERP in their own cloud tenant. **Detail:** Deployed in the same VPC or region so schedule and ERP data do not cross a jurisdiction boundary. ### Hybrid **Fit:** Multi-plant groups with a central planning team and local ERPs. **Detail:** A central governance layer queries each plant's scheduling and ERP sources, leaving data in place. ## Compliance ### Because the model and data run in an environment the customer controls, the customer can keep controlled technical data and program schedules inside access-controlled infrastructure and apply their own US-person access rules. **Framework:** ITAR / EAR data handling ### Order, routing and delivery data never reaches a public AI API, which is the usual condition in prime contractor terms. **Framework:** Customer NDAs and program flow-downs ### Schedule explanations and reconciliations are logged and reproducible, supporting the control of planning records during audits. **Framework:** AS9100 and ISO 9001 records ### Operator and customer personal data stays on infrastructure you control, simplifying transfer assessments. **Framework:** GDPR and regional data protection ## Integration Notes PlanetTogether imports ERP data into its own model and publishes results back; the AI layer reads both sides and should be pointed at the same staging tables or interface your integration already uses, not a new side channel. Read scheduling data from a restricted database role or exported snapshots; avoid giving the AI any account that can change the live scenario. Scenario names and version timestamps are indexed so questions can specify which scenario is meant. Without this, answers about the plan are ambiguous. Custom fields and user-defined data added by the implementation partner are mapped in the semantic layer, otherwise rules specific to your plant are invisible to the assistant. ERP-side reads use the ERP's documented API or a read replica (for example SyteLine IDOs, SAP OData, or NetSuite SuiteQL), respecting the ERP's own role model. Write-back is limited to drafts: a proposed priority change or note is queued for a planner, who applies it inside PlanetTogether and publishes as usual. Plan for version differences: the connector is tested against your PlanetTogether release and re-tested at upgrade, as with any integration. ## Product Fit ### ERPray **Why:** Planners and supervisors get grounded natural-language questions and dashboards across the ERP side of the picture: orders, inventory, purchasing and shortages, alongside schedule snapshots. ### DataRay **Why:** Where scheduling databases, exports, planner spreadsheets and rule documents need to be queried together on-prem, DataRay covers the mixed sources. ### Custom build **Why:** Scenario comparison and change-explanation agents tied to your own rules and custom fields are usually bespoke work. ## Engagement ### Discovery **Duration:** 2-3 weeks **Deliverables:** - Map of PlanetTogether data, scenarios and ERP interfaces in use - Ranked planner questions and pain points - Access and security review - Deployment recommendation ### Pilot **Duration:** 6-8 weeks **Deliverables:** - Read-only connectors to a non-production scenario set - Schedule change explanation and late-order tracing live for a pilot team - Accuracy review against planner-verified answers - Logging validated ### Production **Duration:** 4-6 weeks **Deliverables:** - Production cutover with scoped service accounts - Runbook for adding questions and fields - Planner training on scenario-aware prompting - Audit log review process ### Scale **Duration:** Ongoing **Deliverables:** - Additional plants and ERPs - Approved draft-action workflows - Model refresh as open-weight options improve - Quarterly accuracy review ## Buyer Questions - Does the AI change the schedule or run the optimizer, or does it only read and propose? - How does it know which scenario a question refers to, and can it compare two scenarios reliably? - Which credentials does it use for PlanetTogether and the ERP, and are they read-only? - How are our custom fields, optimization rules and capabilities represented so answers reflect our plant? - Where does the model run, and can you show us the network path? - How are answers validated against what a planner would find manually? - What happens at our next PlanetTogether or ERP upgrade? - If we stop using you, do we keep the connectors, prompts and logs? ## Faq ### Does AI replace the PlanetTogether optimizer? **Answer:** No. The schedule remains the output of PlanetTogether's own optimization rules and the planner's decisions. The AI layer explains what changed, compares scenarios, traces late orders and reconciles with the ERP. Anything it proposes is a draft for a planner to apply inside PlanetTogether. ### Is a private AI layer worth it if PlanetTogether already has good reporting? **Answer:** For fixed reports and Gantt views, often not. The value is in ad hoc, explanatory and cross-system questions: why did this move, which constraint is real, where do the ERP and plan disagree. If your planners rarely ask those, built-in tools may be enough. ### Can it handle several scenarios and plants? **Answer:** Yes, provided scenario names and plant identifiers are indexed in the semantic layer so each question is scoped. Multi-plant groups typically start with one plant and extend once answers are verified. ### What about data security for defense programs? **Answer:** The model, retrieval and connectors run on infrastructure you control, so program schedules and customer data are not sent to a public AI service. You apply your own access controls and export-control procedures to the environment. ### How does it connect to our ERP? **Answer:** Through the ERP's documented API or a read replica using a scoped read-only account, so ERP role rules still apply. Typical sources include SyteLine IDOs, SAP OData services, NetSuite SuiteQL, or direct SQL views where policy allows. ### Can it write back priorities or dates? **Answer:** It can draft a proposed change and queue it for a planner, but it does not alter the live scenario or publish. A planner applies the change in PlanetTogether, so existing approval and audit practice stays intact. ### How long does a pilot take? **Answer:** Discovery is usually two to three weeks and a pilot six to eight, depending on the number of ERPs, custom fields and scenarios in scope. A single-plant, single-ERP pilot sits at the shorter end. ## Search terms PlanetTogether AI, PlanetTogether APS integration, AI for APS scheduling, advanced planning and scheduling AI, PlanetTogether ERP integration, finite capacity scheduling AI, scenario comparison APS, private AI for production scheduling, on-prem AI manufacturing scheduling, APS and ERP reconciliation, PlanetTogether SAP integration, PlanetTogether copilot --- Talk to an engineer: https://netray.co/contact?intent=erp_ai | Machine catalog: https://netray.co/agent/catalog.json