# Baan to SAP Migration vs Infor LN: Baan ERP vs SAP S/4HANA > Source: https://netray.co/resources/baan-to-sap-vs-infor-comparison > Publisher: Netray (netray.co), AI and integration engineering for ERP and manufacturing systems. > Section: Knowledge Base ## Short answer Baan to SAP migration versus Infor LN: compare functional fit, the 12-18 vs 18-30 month timelines, customization rework and cost for Baan ERP manufacturers. ## Category migration ## Content **Intro:** The two most common migration targets for BAAN organizations are Infor LN (the direct successor to BAAN) and SAP S/4HANA (the dominant enterprise ERP). This comparison analyzes both paths across dimensions that matter most to manufacturing companies: functional fit for make-to-order and engineer-to-order processes, migration complexity and timeline, total cost of ownership, and long-term strategic value. The right choice depends on your manufacturing complexity, global footprint, and appetite for business process change. **Sections:** #### Functional Fit for Manufacturing **Body:** Infor LN inherits BAAN's DNA for complex manufacturing including project-based manufacturing, engineer-to-order, and multi-site production. BAAN users typically find 80-90% functional alignment with LN, meaning fewer process redesigns and customizations. SAP S/4HANA is stronger in discrete and repetitive manufacturing but requires more adaptation for project-centric workflows. SAP's PP (Production Planning) and PS (Project System) modules can handle similar scenarios but with different process paradigms that require retraining. **Bullets:** - Infor LN: Direct functional successor to BAAN with native project manufacturing, assembly control, and multi-site logistics matching BAAN's architecture - SAP S/4HANA: Stronger in standard discrete manufacturing (MRP, shop floor control) but requires PS module configuration for project-based manufacturing - Infor LN: BAAN's multi-company, multi-currency architecture carries forward with minimal redesign for global manufacturers - SAP S/4HANA: Company code structure differs from BAAN's model, requiring organizational structure redesign for multi-entity manufacturers - Infor LN: BaanBoard community knowledge transfers directly to LN; SAP migration requires building entirely new process knowledge #### Migration Complexity and Timeline **Body:** Migration from BAAN to Infor LN is an upgrade path, while migration to SAP is a reimplementation. This distinction drives significant differences in timeline, effort, and risk. Infor provides migration tools (Infor Migration Workbench) with pre-built data mapping templates and customization assessment utilities. SAP migration requires greenfield implementation with manual data migration, full business process redesign, and complete user retraining. Industry benchmarks show BAAN-to-LN migrations at 12-18 months versus BAAN-to-SAP at 18-30 months for comparable scope. **Bullets:** - BAAN to Infor LN: 12-18 months typical, leveraging upgrade tools, partial customization portability, and familiar user concepts - BAAN to SAP S/4HANA: 18-30 months typical, requiring full reimplementation, complete data remapping, and organizational change management - Customization migration: LN preserves 40-60% of BAAN customization logic with moderate rework; SAP requires 100% rebuild in ABAP/Fiori - Data migration: LN data mapping is 70% pre-defined through Infor tools; SAP requires custom mapping for every BAAN table to SAP equivalent #### Total Cost of Ownership and Strategic Value **Body:** TCO analysis over a 10-year horizon must account for license costs, implementation services, annual maintenance, cloud hosting, and internal support staffing. Infor LN on Infor CloudSuite offers predictable subscription pricing with lower implementation costs. SAP S/4HANA Cloud carries higher license costs but provides access to a larger ecosystem of partners, integrations, and talent. The strategic decision often comes down to whether the organization values lowest migration risk (Infor LN) or broadest ecosystem access (SAP). **Bullets:** - Implementation cost: BAAN-to-LN typically 40-60% less than BAAN-to-SAP due to shorter timeline and reduced process redesign effort - License/subscription: Infor CloudSuite pricing is generally 20-30% lower than SAP S/4HANA Cloud for comparable user counts and modules - Talent availability: SAP skills are more widely available (10x larger talent pool) but command higher compensation rates than Infor specialists - Ecosystem: SAP offers broader third-party integration marketplace; Infor provides deeper industry-specific functionality out-of-box for manufacturing **Cta:** Compare your BAAN migration options with expert analysis. Contact Netray for migration advisory. **Faq:** #### How does Baan ERP compare with SAP? **Answer:** Baan was built for complex manufacturing, including project-based and engineer-to-order work and multi-site, multi-company operations. SAP S/4HANA is strong in standard discrete manufacturing and has a far larger partner and talent ecosystem, but project-centric workflows need Project System configuration and a different company code structure than Baan's multi-company model. #### How long does a Baan to SAP migration take? **Answer:** Typically 18-30 months, because it is a reimplementation with full data remapping, customization rebuild in ABAP or Fiori, and user retraining. A move to Infor LN, the direct successor, usually runs 12-18 months for comparable scope. ## Related Slugs - baan-4-end-of-life-migration-options - baan-customization-migration-strategy - baan-erp-to-cloud-migration-guide ## Search terms BAAN to SAP migration comparison, BAAN vs Infor LN migration, BAAN ERP replacement options, SAP S/4HANA vs Infor LN for BAAN, BAAN migration cost comparison --- Talk to an engineer: https://netray.co/contact?intent=erp_ai | Machine catalog: https://netray.co/agent/catalog.json