# PLM Selection Scorecard Worksheet

> Source: https://netray.co/tools/plm-selection-scorecard-worksheet
> Publisher: Netray (netray.co), AI and integration engineering for ERP and manufacturing systems.
> Section: Free Tools

## Short answer

A weighted scorecard to compare three PLM candidates on change management, BOM, CAD and ERP integration, cost and vendor fit.

## Category

engineering-plm

## Industry

Discrete Manufacturing

## Audience

- Engineering manager
- IT manager
- CIO

## Tool

**Kind:** worksheet

**Mode:** editable

**Columns:**

#### Criterion

**Key:** criterion

**Type:** text

#### Weight (1-10)

**Key:** weight

**Type:** number

#### Vendor A score (0-5)

**Key:** a

**Type:** number

#### Vendor B score (0-5)

**Key:** b

**Type:** number

#### Vendor C score (0-5)

**Key:** c

**Type:** number

#### Weighted A

**Key:** wa

**Type:** number

**Expr:** weight * a

**Format:** decimal

#### Weighted B

**Key:** wb

**Type:** number

**Expr:** weight * b

**Format:** decimal

#### Weighted C

**Key:** wc

**Type:** number

**Expr:** weight * c

**Format:** decimal

**Rows:**

**Criterion:** Engineering change and workflow management

**Weight:** 10

**A:** 4

**B:** 3

**C:** 5

**Criterion:** BOM management (EBOM, MBOM, variants)

**Weight:** 9

**A:** 4

**B:** 4

**C:** 3

**Criterion:** CAD integration (mechanical and electrical)

**Weight:** 9

**A:** 5

**B:** 3

**C:** 4

**Criterion:** ERP integration (item, BOM, change release)

**Weight:** 10

**A:** 3

**B:** 4

**C:** 4

**Criterion:** Document and revision control

**Weight:** 8

**A:** 4

**B:** 4

**C:** 4

**Criterion:** Supplier and supply chain collaboration

**Weight:** 5

**A:** 3

**B:** 3

**C:** 4

**Criterion:** Compliance and audit trail (regulated industries)

**Weight:** 7

**A:** 4

**B:** 4

**C:** 3

**Criterion:** Usability and adoption effort

**Weight:** 8

**A:** 3

**B:** 5

**C:** 3

**Criterion:** Total cost of ownership over 5 years

**Weight:** 8

**A:** 2

**B:** 4

**C:** 3

**Criterion:** Deployment options (cloud, on-prem, air-gapped)

**Weight:** 6

**A:** 4

**B:** 2

**C:** 5

**Criterion:** Vendor viability and local support

**Weight:** 6

**A:** 4

**B:** 3

**C:** 3

**Totals:**

#### Total weight

**Key:** weight

**Agg:** sum

**Format:** integer

#### Total weighted A

**Key:** wa

**Agg:** sum

**Format:** decimal

#### Total weighted B

**Key:** wb

**Agg:** sum

**Format:** decimal

#### Total weighted C

**Key:** wc

**Agg:** sum

**Format:** decimal

**Summary:**

#### Vendor A, percent of maximum

**Key:** pa

**Expr:** if(gt(sum_weight, 0), sum_wa / (sum_weight * 5) * 100, 0)

**Format:** percent

**Primary:** true

#### Vendor B, percent of maximum

**Key:** pb

**Expr:** if(gt(sum_weight, 0), sum_wb / (sum_weight * 5) * 100, 0)

**Format:** percent

**Primary:** true

#### Vendor C, percent of maximum

**Key:** pc

**Expr:** if(gt(sum_weight, 0), sum_wc / (sum_weight * 5) * 100, 0)

**Format:** percent

**Notes:** Rename Vendor A, B and C in your export. Agree the weights with stakeholders before scoring any vendor, and score from demonstrations and reference calls, not brochures. Scores are your judgment, and no product is rated here.

## Content

**Intro:** Choosing a PLM system is a multi-year commitment, and the decision is usually argued from feature lists. A weighted scorecard forces you to agree on what matters first and then compare vendors against the same yardstick.

**Sections:**

#### How to use the PLM scorecard

**Body:** Start with the criteria and edit them to fit your needs, adding rows for anything specific such as a particular CAD system or regulatory requirement. Set weights from 1 to 10 with your stakeholders before looking at any vendor, so the weights are not bent to favor a favorite. Then score each candidate from 0 to 5 per criterion, using demonstrations of your own scenarios and reference calls. The sheet multiplies weight by score, totals each vendor and shows the percentage of the maximum possible. Export to Excel to share with the steering group, and keep the weighted totals alongside a short written rationale.

**Bullets:**

- Agree weights before any vendor demonstration
- Score from scripted demos using your own parts and changes
- Use the same scoring scale definitions for everyone
- Include IT, manufacturing, quality and purchasing in the scoring

#### Criteria that usually matter most

**Body:** For manufacturers, the highest-impact criteria are engineering change management, BOM handling (engineering versus manufacturing BOM and variants), CAD integration, and the integration with the ERP that executes the BOM. A PLM that cannot release items, BOMs and changes cleanly to the ERP leads to double entry and errors. Next come document and revision control, compliance and audit trail for regulated work, usability, because adoption decides whether the system is actually used, and total cost of ownership including implementation, licensing, integration and upgrades. Deployment options matter if you work with controlled or classified data that cannot go to a public cloud.

#### Reading the result

**Body:** The sample weights and scores are illustrative placeholders, not a rating of any real product. A vendor scoring above roughly 75 percent is a strong fit against your own criteria, but small gaps between vendors are within the noise of subjective scoring. If two vendors are within about five points, run a deeper proof of concept on the highest-weight criteria, particularly the ERP integration and engineering change workflow. Also check that no vendor scores 0 or 1 on a must-have criterion, since a weighted total can hide a fatal gap.

#### Common mistakes

**Body:** Selecting PLM from a feature checklist means everyone ticks yes and nothing is learned. Better to ask vendors to demonstrate a real change from request to ERP release. Another common mistake is underestimating data migration and the cost of cleaning part and BOM data, which often exceeds the license cost. A third is letting one department choose: PLM touches engineering, manufacturing, quality and purchasing, and a tool that suits only the design team is poorly used elsewhere. Finally, many small manufacturers need less than a full PLM; a controlled ERP change process may be enough.

**Cta:** Netray does not sell PLM. If useful, we can review how a candidate would exchange items, BOMs and changes with your ERP and flag integration risks before you decide. The scorecard is free to use as is.

**Faq:**

#### What are the key criteria for selecting a PLM system?

**Answer:** Engineering change management, BOM management, CAD integration, ERP integration, document control, compliance, usability, total cost of ownership, deployment options and vendor support. Weight them according to your products and industry.

#### Do I need PLM or is my ERP enough?

**Answer:** If you have few products, simple BOMs and few changes, ERP-based change control may be enough. PLM becomes valuable with complex products, many revisions, multiple CAD systems or strong regulatory traceability needs.

#### How many vendors should I score?

**Answer:** Three to five serious candidates is practical. Screen a longer list with must-have criteria first, then use the weighted scorecard on the shortlist, supported by scripted demonstrations and reference calls.

#### How do I avoid bias in scoring?

**Answer:** Agree the weights first, use written scoring definitions, have multiple people score independently and average, and base scores on demonstrations of your own scenarios instead of presentations.

## Search terms

PLM selection scorecard, PLM vendor evaluation template, PLM comparison matrix, choosing a PLM system, PLM requirements checklist excel, product lifecycle management evaluation criteria, PLM RFP scoring, PLM software selection criteria

---
Talk to an engineer: https://netray.co/contact?intent=erp_ai | Machine catalog: https://netray.co/agent/catalog.json