Infor M3

Infor M3 Upgrade Path Planning: From Assessment to Go-Live with Minimal Disruption

Upgrading Infor M3 is one of the highest-stakes projects an organization undertakes. Whether moving from M3 13.1 to 13.4, transitioning to M3 CE (Cloud Edition), or migrating to multi-tenant Infor OS, the upgrade path involves customization assessment, regression testing, data migration, and business continuity planning. Organizations that approach upgrades reactively face 2-3x cost overruns and extended downtime. This guide provides the strategic framework for planning M3 upgrades systematically.

Customization Assessment and Fit-Gap Analysis

Every M3 upgrade begins with understanding what has been modified. Customizations in M3 span multiple layers: modified standard programs (MAK files), custom MI programs, MEC maps, ION configurations, reports, and database modifications. Each customization must be categorized as critical (must migrate), replaceable (standard feature available in target version), or obsolete (no longer needed). Organizations with 200+ customizations typically need 3-6 months for assessment alone.

  • Inventory all MAK (modification) files using LifeCycle Manager and categorize by business criticality and usage frequency
  • Analyze custom MI programs for compatibility with target version API changes and deprecation notices
  • Review MEC maps and ION configurations for deprecated features and required migration to updated frameworks
  • Assess database modifications: custom tables, triggers, stored procedures, and additional columns on standard tables
  • Estimate remediation effort per customization: rewrite (40-80 hours), adapt (8-24 hours), or retire (2-4 hours)

Test Strategy, Regression Testing, and Environment Planning

M3 upgrade testing requires multiple environments and a structured test plan covering functional regression, integration verification, performance benchmarking, and user acceptance. The test matrix should cover every business process end-to-end: order-to-cash, procure-to-pay, plan-to-produce, and record-to-report. Automated regression testing using M3 MI programs can validate 80% of standard functionality, freeing testers to focus on customized processes.

  • Provision minimum 3 environments: Development (customization migration), QA (integration testing), and Staging (UAT/performance)
  • Build test scripts covering 100% of critical business processes with expected results and validation criteria
  • Automate regression testing via MI program calls: create test orders, process transactions, validate GL postings
  • Performance benchmark: compare transaction response times and batch job durations between current and target versions
  • Plan 3 UAT cycles with escalating scope: core processes (cycle 1), integrations (cycle 2), full dress rehearsal (cycle 3)

Cutover Planning, Data Migration, and Go-Live Strategy

The cutover weekend is where upgrade projects succeed or fail. A detailed cutover plan with task-level timing, responsibility assignments, and go/no-go decision points ensures controlled execution. Data migration handles open transactions (orders, POs, production orders), in-flight integrations, and master data changes between cutover start and go-live. Netray AI agents can monitor cutover progress and flag deviations from the plan in real time.

  • Build cutover runbook with 50-100 sequenced tasks, each with owner, estimated duration, and verification step
  • Schedule dry-run cutovers on non-production environments: minimum 2 rehearsals before production go-live
  • Plan data migration for open transactions: freeze-at-cutover for completed transactions, bridge for in-flight items
  • Define go/no-go decision criteria at 25%, 50%, and 75% cutover completion with rollback procedures at each gate
  • Configure post-go-live monitoring: critical job schedules, integration throughput, and user-reported issue triage

Plan your M3 upgrade with confidence using Netray's AI-powered assessment tools—start your readiness review.