SyteLine Security Roles Best Practices
Security role design in SyteLine determines who can see what data, execute which transactions, and access which forms. A well-designed security model enforces least-privilege access, simplifies user provisioning, and satisfies audit requirements. A poorly designed model—typically one that started with broad access and was never refined—creates compliance risks, data integrity exposures, and audit findings that are expensive to remediate after the fact.
Role Architecture and Design Principles
SyteLine security operates at multiple levels: form access, IDO property visibility, method execution permissions, and row-level security through site and company filtering. Design roles around job functions, not individuals. A role like 'Production Planner' or 'AP Clerk' should define the minimum access needed for that function. Users receive one or more roles, and effective permissions are the union of all assigned roles.
- Design roles around job functions with clearly documented access boundaries and business justification
- Use role composition—combine granular roles rather than creating monolithic roles per department
- Implement the principle of least privilege: start with no access and add permissions explicitly
- Separate transactional roles from inquiry-only roles to support audit segregation of duties
Segregation of Duties and Audit Compliance
SOX, ISO, and industry-specific audit frameworks require segregation of duties (SoD) in ERP systems. In SyteLine, key SoD conflicts include: creating and approving purchase orders, entering and posting journal entries, maintaining vendor master data and processing vendor payments. Map these conflicts to your role design and build technical controls that prevent a single user from holding conflicting roles.
- Map critical SoD conflicts for your industry and build role exclusion rules to prevent them
- Use the SyteLine security audit report to identify users with potentially conflicting role assignments
- Implement quarterly access reviews where managers certify that user role assignments remain appropriate
- Document role-to-permission mappings in a security matrix that auditors can review independently
Security Maintenance and Monitoring
Security models degrade over time as users accumulate roles through job changes, temporary access grants become permanent, and new forms are deployed without proper security configuration. Implement a lifecycle process: provisioning based on HR job codes, quarterly certification reviews, automatic deprovisioning for terminated or transferred employees, and continuous monitoring for privilege escalation.
- Automate user provisioning and deprovisioning based on HR system job code changes
- Run monthly reports on users with administrative or super-user roles to verify appropriateness
- Monitor failed access attempts as potential indicators of misconfigured roles or unauthorized access
- Maintain a security change log documenting all role modifications with approver and business justification
Strengthen your SyteLine security posture—our consultants design audit-ready role architectures.
Related Resources
SyteLine Form Personalization Complete Guide
Complete guide to SyteLine form personalization. Field visibility, layout changes, conditional logic, and user-level personalizations without code changes.
Infor SyteLineSyteLine Workflow Engine Configuration Guide
Configure SyteLine workflow engine for approval routing, notifications, and process automation. Best practices for CloudSuite Industrial workflows.
Infor SyteLineSyteLine Multi-Company Setup and Administration
Configure SyteLine multi-company environments. Intercompany transactions, shared master data, consolidated reporting, and site administration.