ERP Project Health Check: Governance and Delivery Assessment
Most ERP projects that struggle show warning signs months before go-live. This assessment checks ten areas that predict delivery trouble, so a sponsor or project manager can see where the program is exposed.
1. How active is your executive sponsor?
2. How is scope controlled?
3. What is the state of data migration?
4. How available are business super users?
5. How is testing planned?
6. How are integrations handled?
7. How is the risk register used?
8. How is training planned?
9. How mature is cutover planning?
10. How reliable is status reporting?
How to use it
Answer based on what is true today, not on the plan. Ideally have the project manager, business owner and a technical lead answer independently and compare. Differences between their answers are often more revealing than the score. Repeat the assessment at each phase gate to track the trend.
What the questions measure
The ten questions cover the areas where ERP programs most often fail: sponsorship, scope, data, people, testing, integration, risk management, training, cutover and reporting. Each answer scores zero to three and the total is shown as a percentage of the maximum.
- Governance: sponsor, scope, risk, reporting
- Delivery: data, testing, integration
- Readiness: people, training, cutover
- Scores are indicators, not guarantees
Reading the result
A low score does not mean the project will fail; it means the missing items should be treated as risks with owners. Focus on the lowest-scoring answers first. A project with good scores overall but a zero on cutover planning still carries a serious exposure that the average hides.
Common mistakes
Answering optimistically is the main failure: score what is evidenced, such as a signed baseline or a completed mock load, not what is intended. Also avoid using the result to blame teams. Use it to decide what to fix before the next gate.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this a formal ERP audit?
No. It is a quick self-assessment that highlights common risk areas. A formal independent review looks at contracts, code, test evidence and data quality in depth.
When should I run it?
At each major phase gate, and any time the team feels the project is drifting. Comparing scores over time is more useful than a single result.
What score should trigger a pause?
A score under 40 percent, or a zero on data migration, testing or cutover, is a good reason to stop and replan before committing more spend or fixing a go-live date.
Does it apply to cloud ERP projects?
Yes. Cloud products reduce infrastructure work, but data, integrations, testing, training and cutover remain the main sources of delay.
For an outside perspective on a troubled or stalled ERP program, Netray can discuss a structured review of data, integration and cutover readiness.
Related Tools
ERP Implementation Risk Register Worksheet
An editable risk register for ERP projects that scores each risk as probability times impact and exports to Excel.
ERP Migration & SelectionERP Project Weekly Status Report Template
A one page weekly status report for ERP projects with RAG ratings, milestone progress, risks and decisions needed. Exports to PDF or Word.
ERP Migration & SelectionERP Go-Live War Room Checklist
A checklist for running the war room on go-live day and through the first critical week.
ERP Migration & SelectionERP Implementation Methodology Phases Reference
Compare the phase names and focus of the major vendor ERP implementation methodologies in one searchable table.
More ERP Migration & Selection tools
See all- ERP TCO Comparison Calculator (5-Year)
- ERP Migration Risk Assessment
- Data Migration Effort Calculator
- ERP Selection Scorecard for Manufacturers
- ERP Go-Live Readiness Checklist
- ERP Change Management Readiness Assessment
- ERP Integration Complexity Calculator
- Cloud vs On-Premise ERP Cost Calculator
- ERP Upgrade vs Replace Assessment
Keep exploring
Free tools
- Infor LN Integration Health AssessmentScore the health of your Infor LN integration landscape across architecture, monitoring, error recovery, EDI, and governance in ten quick questions.
- D365 F&O Implementation Health AssessmentTen-question self-assessment of customization load, update discipline, security, data quality and reporting for a D365 F&O environment.
- Product Costing Accuracy Health AssessmentA ten-question self-check that scores how trustworthy your standard costs and job costs are and what to fix first.
ERP fixes and how-tos
- Is Your ERP Data Ready for AI? A Readiness ChecklistMost ERP data is ready enough to pilot AI today. A practical checklist of the master-data and access-control issues that actually break AI answers.
- ERP AI Governance: Do You Need a Board and What Should It Do?ERP AI governance explained: what a board should own, who sits on it, how to approve AI use cases on ERP data, and a one-page charter you can adopt.
Guides
- ERP Data Governance FrameworkEstablish an ERP data governance framework with defined policies, stewardship roles, and quality metrics. Maintain data integrity across the ERP lifecycle.
- A Data Governance Framework for Private AI DeploymentsA practical data governance framework for private AI: classification, access controls, retention, and audit patterns that satisfy CMMC 2.0 and ITAR.
- RACI and Governance for AI ProjectsRACI and governance for AI projects: the decisions that actually need a defined owner, a sample assignment for manufacturing, and a lightweight steering model.