Compliance & ContractsFree assessmentPDF, Excel, Word export

Manufacturing Contract Risk Exposure Assessment

Most contract problems in manufacturing come from habits, not from one bad clause: signing customer paper without a cap, missing a renewal date, or passing a requirement to the wrong supplier. This assessment scores the habits that control that risk.

0 of 10 answered0%

1. How are liability caps handled in customer contracts?

2. Do you exclude or limit consequential damages such as line stoppage and lost profit?

3. Do you know which contracts auto-renew and when notice is due?

4. How do you manage flowdown clauses from customers to suppliers?

5. Who owns tooling, drawings and IP created in a program?

6. How do you handle conflicting terms between POs and acknowledgments?

7. How are warranty and recall exposures tracked?

8. Do contracts specify governing law and dispute resolution that you have reviewed?

9. How are export control and sanctions clauses handled?

10. Can you find a signed contract and its amendments within minutes?

How to use the assessment

Answer based on what happens in practice, not what policy says. If you are not sure, choose the lower score, because uncertainty about contract terms is itself a sign of exposure. Run it with someone from sales, purchasing and finance if you can, and compare answers. Differences between departments often reveal the real gaps.

What the questions test

The questions cover five areas: liability limits, renewal control, flowdown discipline, IP and tooling ownership, and retrievability of signed documents. These are chosen because they cause the largest unplanned costs for manufacturers: uncapped claims, silent renewals, passing the wrong terms to suppliers, and disputes over who owns a tool or a design.

Liability and consequential damages
Renewals and notice dates
Flowdown to suppliers
IP and tooling ownership
Document retrieval

Reading your score

A low score means start with a register: you cannot manage what you cannot list. A mid score means build a playbook so positions are consistent. A high score means test the system with an audit of exceptions. The score is a conversation starter and not a legal opinion about any one contract.

Common mistakes

Treating contract management as a legal-only job, keeping contracts away from ERP records, and measuring only value rather than risk. Also, many firms review the main customer agreement carefully but ignore purchase order terms, which often govern the actual shipment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this a legal audit?

No. It is a self-assessment of contract management practices. It does not review any specific contract or give legal advice. Use counsel for contract review.

What should I fix first if my score is low?

Build a register of active contracts with end dates, notice periods, liability caps and owners. That single list prevents many surprises and gives you a base for deciding what to review in detail.

Does this apply to small manufacturers?

Yes. Small firms often have less negotiating power and less legal support, so a simple playbook and a renewal list give a good return. Scale the process to your size, not the other way around.

How often should I repeat it?

Once a year is enough for most teams, or after a major customer win, acquisition or ERP change. Compare scores over time and focus on the questions that moved the least.

If you want a read-only view that links contracts, orders and deadlines in your ERP, Netray can scope that with you and keep a person approving any action.

Talk to an Expert Explore More Free Tools

Related Tools

Compliance & Contracts

More Compliance & Contracts tools

See all

Back to All Tools