Electronics ManufacturingFree calculatorPDF, Excel, Word exportElectronics Manufacturing

SMT Placement Cost Per Board Calculator

Rated CPH on a datasheet is a ceiling, not a quoting basis. This calculator turns placement counts by component class into realized cycle time and a cost per board and per placement, so a quote reflects how fast the machine actually runs the job.

Your numbers

per board

0402 to 1206 passives, small SOT and similar high speed parts.

per board

QFP, QFN, BGA, SOIC and other parts placed on the fine pitch head.

per board

Connectors, shields, large electrolytics and other slow placements.

CPH

Machine datasheet rated speed under ideal conditions.

CPH
CPH
65 %

Realized speed as a share of rated, covering feeder changes, vision checks, nozzle changes and micro stops.

sec

Conveyor transfer, clamp and board fiducial reads per board or array.

$/hour

Machine depreciation, operator share, power, maintenance and floor space.

minutes

Feeder loading and verification for the job.

boards

Your results

Placement cost per board
$5
Cost per placement
$0
Useful to compare against per-placement pricing in a quote.
Placement time per board
129.8462
Seconds, at realized speed.
Machine cycle per board
147.8462
Seconds including handling.
Boards per hour
24.3496
Run cost per board
$5
Setup cost per board
$0
Machine hours for the job
21 hrs

Single placement machine model. On a multi machine line the slowest machine sets the cycle; run the calculation for the bottleneck machine. Rated CPH follows each vendor's own test method.

Save results:

Placement cost per board vs placement efficiency

Sweeps Placement efficiency from 30 to 95, holding your other inputs fixed.

Pull placement data from your MES

An optional conversation about feeding measured cycle times and efficiency into your quoting logic.

Optional. The tool and every export work without this. No spam.

How to use it

Count placements, not unique part numbers, and split them into chip parts, fine pitch parts and odd form parts, because each runs at a very different speed. Enter each head's rated CPH from the machine datasheet and a realistic placement efficiency, typically well below 100 percent once you account for feeder changeovers, vision retries, nozzle swaps and small stops. Add handling time per board or array, the machine hourly rate and the job setup time. The result is cost per board, cost per placement and total machine hours for the job.

The formulas

Placement time for each class is placements divided by (rated CPH times efficiency), multiplied by 3,600 to give seconds. Total cycle is the sum across classes plus handling. Run cost is cycle seconds divided by 3,600 times the machine rate. Setup per board is setup minutes divided by 60 times the rate, divided by quantity. Everything is arithmetic on your own inputs, so it is auditable against your MES cycle time data.

  • t = placements / (CPH x efficiency) x 3600 sec
  • Cycle = sum of class times + handling
  • Boards per hour = 3600 / cycle
  • Cost = cycle/3600 x rate + setup/qty

Reading the result

Compare cost per placement with what the quote template or your competitors charge. If the figure is far above the chip part average, odd form placements or low efficiency are usually the reason. The sweep shows cost against efficiency: moving from 50 to 70 percent can cut run cost by a quarter, which tells you whether feeder standardization or kitting accuracy is worth the effort. Remember this covers only the placement machine; printing, reflow, AOI and manual work are separate lines.

Common mistakes

Using rated CPH as realized speed overstates throughput and underprices low volume work, where setup and handling dominate. Counting each component reel instead of each placement understates time on high count boards. Another error is applying the machine rate to the whole line when only one machine is the bottleneck. Finally, do not forget multi-up arrays: handling time is per array, so divide by boards per array if you enter per-board handling.

  • Count placements, not line items
  • Use measured efficiency from MES where you have it
  • Handling is per array, not necessarily per board
  • Do not mix this with a whole-line rate

Frequently Asked Questions

What placement efficiency should I use?

Start at 55 to 75 percent for mixed high-mix work and compare against your own machine logs. High-volume, stable products with few changeovers can run higher. Measured data from your placement machine beats any rule of thumb.

Why split chip and IC placements?

Rated CPH differs by an order of magnitude between chip shooters and fine pitch or odd form heads. A single average speed hides that, and misprices boards that are heavy on connectors or BGA.

Does this include solder paste printing and reflow?

No. It prices only the placement machine. Add printing, reflow, AOI, X-ray, test, manual assembly and material handling as separate lines in your quote.

How do I handle a multi-up array?

Enter placements for the whole array, boards in the job as the number of arrays, and handling per array. Then divide the resulting cost by boards per array to get cost per board.

If you want measured efficiency and placement counts pulled from your MES and ERP into quotes automatically, we can build that integration, including on-prem deployments.