Costing & FinanceFree worksheetPDF, Excel, Word exportMachining

Threading and Tapping Job Cost Estimate Worksheet

Threading looks cheap until a broken tap or a long thread mill cycle shows up in the actuals. This worksheet separates machine time cost from tooling cost per part so estimates stand up against reality.

Download:
ThreadMethodThreads per partSeconds per thread (sec)Machine rate ($/hr)Tool costThreads per toolLot sizeMachine cost per partTool cost per partTotal per partCost per lot
$0
$0
$0
$240
$1
$0
$1
$305
$1
$0
$1
$389
$1
$0
$1
$685
Total threading cost per part
$3
Total cost for lot
$1,619
Cost per thread operation (average)
$1

Tool life values are placeholders and depend heavily on material and lubrication. Replace with your own tool log data. Setup time, inspection and broken tap recovery are not included; add rows or markup for them.

Compare estimates to actual costs

Optional: ask how actual run times and tool costs could feed back into your ERP estimates.

Optional. The tool and every export work without this. No spam.

How to use the estimate

Add one row per thread feature. Pick the method, enter how many threads the part has, the seconds per thread, machine rate per hour, tool price and expected threads per tool. The sheet gives machine cost, tool cost and total per part, then multiplies by lot size. Export the result to Excel and add setup, inspection and handling elsewhere in your quote.

Method trade-offs

Cut taps are common and inexpensive but can break in blind holes. Form taps produce stronger threads with no chips in suitable ductile materials but need correct hole size and lubrication. Thread milling costs more per tool and runs longer per hole, but the cutter does not seize, can run different diameters, and a break is usually recoverable. Single point threading on a lathe suits external threads and larger diameters.

Reading the output

Machine cost usually dominates for slow operations, such as thread milling, and tool cost dominates for expensive taps in tough alloys with short life. If tool cost per part rises sharply, check the tool life input first; a small change in assumed life swings the result. Compare methods on the same part by duplicating a row with a different method and judging total per part, not just cycle time.

Common mistakes

Do not assume catalog tool life applies to your material and coolant. Do not omit chip clearing on deep blind holes, which adds time. Avoid forgetting the cost of a broken tap, which can scrap a finished part; include a risk allowance when quoting hard materials. Also keep machine rate consistent with your burdened hourly rate, not just the labor rate.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does it take to tap a hole?

It depends on size, depth, material and whether the machine uses rigid tapping. Small holes can take a few seconds including approach and retract; large or deep holes take longer. Use your machine's actual cycle time from a test run for quotes.

Is thread milling more expensive than tapping?

Per tool, yes, and the cycle is usually longer. However, a thread mill can last for thousands of holes, cuts different diameters with one tool and avoids tap breakage in costly parts. Compare total cost per part using your own numbers.

What machine rate should I use?

Use a burdened rate that includes depreciation, power, maintenance, floor space and operator cost where applicable. Rates vary widely by machine type and region, so take it from your own cost accounting.

Does the sheet include setup time?

No. Setup is a per-lot cost, not per part. Add a separate row for setup with count 1 and the setup time converted to seconds, or handle setup in your overall quote template.

If your costing and routings live in an ERP, Netray can help bring actual tool and machine data back into estimates.