Specialist ERPsUse Case

JobBOSS2 + job shop AI

AI for JobBOSS2 quoting and scheduling

Short answer

AI on JobBOSS2 compares a new request with similar past jobs, using quoted versus actual hours, material, and outside services, and helps schedulers see why a job will miss its date. It reads JobBOSS2 data without writing to it, so the estimator and scheduler stay in control. It can be hosted privately for shops with ITAR or customer confidentiality obligations.

ERP
JobBOSS2, ECI JobBOSS
Industries
Job shops, Precision machining, Metal fabrication, Contract manufacturing
Written for
Estimator and Shop Owner

A job shop lives or dies on two decisions: what to quote and how to schedule. Both depend on knowing what similar work really cost and how long it really took. In many JobBOSS2 shops, that knowledge sits in the system but is only reachable by someone who knows which report to run, or by the owner who remembers the last time a similar part was made.

JobBOSS2 holds quotes, jobs, routings, material, time and cost actuals, and the schedule. When an estimator gets a request for a new bracket, the useful question is: what did we quote and what did we actually spend on the three most similar parts? When a scheduler sees a hot job, the useful question is: what does moving it do to everything else?

An assistant on top of JobBOSS2 can answer those questions from your data, show the jobs it used, and let the estimator or scheduler decide. It is not a quoting engine that invents prices. It is a faster way to see your own history.

This page explains how that works on JobBOSS2, where the built-in tools are already good, and how to keep customer drawings and pricing private. Many JobBOSS2 shops serve aerospace, defense, and medical customers, and that matters for where the model runs.

What usually gets in the way

The problems we hear most from estimator and shop owner teams running JobBOSS2.

Quotes built from memory

Estimators lean on gut feel for similar parts because finding the last comparable job in the system takes too long. Margins suffer when the gut is wrong.

Quoted versus actual is not reviewed

Actual hours and material for completed jobs rarely feed back into the next quote, so the same underestimate repeats.

Schedule conflicts found late

A new hot job lands and the scheduler discovers the impact only after dates have been promised.

Outside services slip

Heat treat, plating, and other outside operations add lead time that is easy to miss in a quote or a schedule.

Owner as the only search engine

The shop owner or senior estimator knows which customers and parts are profitable. That knowledge is hard to hand over.

Where AI earns its place in JobBOSS2

Each use case names the ERP objects it reads or writes, so your ERP team can judge the integration effort before anyone commits budget.

Similar job lookup for a new quote

The estimator describes a part, material, quantity, and operations. The assistant finds comparable past jobs, shows quoted and actual hours and cost, and highlights the spread.

Touches: Quotes, quote lines, jobs, routing operations, actual time and material costs, customer and part records

Outcome: Estimators start with evidence from their own history. The quoted price remains the estimator's decision.

Underquoted job pattern finder

Across closed jobs, the assistant identifies operations, materials, or customers where actuals regularly exceed the quote, and ranks them by dollar impact.

Touches: Closed jobs, quoted versus actual cost by operation, material price changes, customer

Outcome: A shortlist of estimating rules to correct. Results depend on how consistently time is recorded.

Quote follow-up and win-loss summary

The assistant lists open quotes by age and value and summarizes win or loss history by customer, so the sales owner knows where to follow up.

Touches: Quotes, quote status, sales orders, customer history

Outcome: Fewer forgotten quotes and a clearer view of where pricing is working.

Schedule impact of a hot job

The planner asks what happens if a rush job is started tomorrow. The assistant lists jobs that would slip, by how long, and by customer, from current schedule data.

Touches: Scheduled operations, work center load, due dates, job priorities

Outcome: Trade-offs are visible before dates are promised. The schedule is changed in JobBOSS2 by a person.

Late job root cause

For a job running behind, the assistant identifies the blocking step: waiting on material, an outside service, a busy work center, or a missing drawing revision.

Touches: Job operations, purchase orders and receipts, outside service operations, work center queue

Outcome: Quicker recovery decisions with fewer calls to the floor.

Material and outside service lead time check

Before a quote is finalized, the assistant checks supplier history for the material and outside services and flags long or unreliable lead times.

Touches: Purchase orders, receipts, vendor records, outside service operations

Outcome: Quotes carry realistic delivery dates instead of optimistic ones.

Weekly shop owner brief

A short summary of jobs at risk, quotes pending, and profitable or unprofitable work completed that week, with the data behind each line.

Touches: Open jobs, scheduled operations, quotes, closed job margin

Outcome: The owner gets a consistent picture without building reports, and can ask follow-up questions in plain language.

Reference architecture

A read-only assistant sits beside JobBOSS2. It uses curated queries and similarity search over job history, and shows the jobs it based each answer on. JobBOSS2 remains the system of record for quotes, jobs, and the schedule.

  1. 1

    Source access

    A read-only path to the JobBOSS2 database or the integration interface your version supports. The exact method is confirmed in discovery.

  2. 2

    Job history index

    Past jobs are described by part attributes, material, operations, quantity, and customer, so similarity search can find comparable work. Drawings are indexed only if you choose to.

  3. 3

    Quoting and schedule queries

    Tested queries for quoted versus actual, open quotes, load by work center, and late jobs, with parameters filled by the model.

  4. 4

    Model serving

    An open-weight model on a workstation-class or server GPU, or a private cloud tenant. Drawings and pricing stay inside your boundary.

  5. 5

    Controls and audit

    User roles, a log of questions, and clear separation between suggestions and entries made in JobBOSS2.

Integration notes for your ERP team

  • Confirm which JobBOSS2 data path is available in your deployment before design. Database access, reporting views, and ECI-supported integration options differ by version and hosting.
  • Similarity search works best when part descriptions, material codes, and operation names are consistent. Plan time to normalize them.
  • Actual time capture quality sets the ceiling on quote feedback. Check shop floor data collection coverage before promising results.
  • Customer-specific price lists and contract terms should be treated as restricted data and excluded unless the user has the right role.
  • Outside service operations often carry lead times in purchase orders, not in routings. Include purchase order history in the data map.
  • Keep suggestions and entries separate. Quotes are created and approved in JobBOSS2 by the estimator.

Deployment options

On-prem or private server beside the JobBOSS2 database

Shops that will not let job, customer, or drawing data leave the building, including ITAR and CUI work.

An open-weight model (Qwen, Llama, Mistral, or gpt-oss class) is served with vLLM or Ollama on a single GPU server on the plant network. Retrieval and query tools run on the same box. Small shops can often start on a single GPU workstation placed in a locked room.

Sovereign or private cloud tenant

Multi-site manufacturers that want managed GPUs without sending data to a shared public AI API.

The model and the vector index run in a private cloud account or a regional sovereign provider, reached from the plant over a private link. Data stays in a tenant you control and you choose the region.

Read-only pilot against a replica

Teams that want to prove value on real data before committing hardware or touching production.

A nightly restore or replica of the JobBOSS2 data feeds a small model and a handful of approved questions. Nothing writes back. Most of the learning is about data quality and which questions people actually ask.

Compliance and data control

How the architecture supports your obligations. Certification and accountability stay with your organisation; the design keeps the evidence straightforward.

ITAR and export-controlled drawings

Private hosting keeps drawings and job data under the customer's control. The customer remains responsible for its registration and handling procedures.

AS9100 and ISO 9001 records

Read-only access protects controlled records. The assistant cites job and routing data, but quality records are edited by authorized staff only.

CMMC and NIST SP 800-171 for CUI

Where jobs contain CUI, the AI stack is placed inside the same enclave and access controls as JobBOSS2, with logging to support the customer's assessment.

Customer NDAs

Role-based visibility keeps one customer's pricing and parts out of answers for users who should not see them.

How an engagement runs

Phase 1 . 1 to 2 weeks

Discovery and data map

  • -Inventory of the JobBOSS2 tables, views, and reports behind quoting and scheduling
  • -Ranked list of 15 to 25 real questions from the people who do the work
  • -Decision on hosting, access method, and which roles may see which data
  • -Written read-only boundary and approval rules for any later write-back

Phase 2 . 2 to 4 weeks

Grounding and retrieval build

  • -Read-only connection with a service account scoped to the approved objects
  • -Curated query layer and document index for quoting and scheduling
  • -Evaluation set of questions with checked answers from your own data
  • -Visible query or source citation on every answer

Phase 3 . 3 to 4 weeks

Pilot with a small group

  • -Pilot with 5 to 15 estimators, planners, supervisors, or quality staff
  • -Weekly review of wrong or unhelpful answers and fixes
  • -Usage log showing which questions were asked and which saved time

Phase 4 . 2 to 3 weeks

Harden and hand over

  • -Role mapping, audit logging, and backup of the AI stack
  • -Runbook for model updates and index refresh after JobBOSS2 upgrades
  • -Go or no-go note on any gated write-back actions

Questions to ask any vendor, including us

A short list that separates real JobBOSS2 AI work from a chatbot demo.

  1. Which JobBOSS2 version and hosting model do we have, and what data access path is available?
  2. How does the assistant define a similar job, and can estimators adjust the criteria?
  3. Does it set prices or only show history?
  4. How is customer pricing separated by role?
  5. What if our time data is incomplete?
  6. Can drawings be included, and where are they stored?
  7. Who approves anything that would change JobBOSS2 records?
  8. What hardware do we need and can it run in our building?

Frequently asked questions

Will the AI set our quote prices?

No. It shows comparable past jobs with quoted and actual cost, and points out where estimates have been low. The estimator decides the price. Keeping a person in that loop avoids hidden errors and keeps accountability clear.

How does it find similar jobs?

It uses part attributes, material, operations, quantity, and customer, plus text descriptions. Consistent naming matters, so part of the pilot is cleaning up descriptions and operation names. Results are shown with the source jobs so the estimator can judge relevance.

Is our customer data safe?

The model runs on your hardware or a private cloud tenant and reads through a read-only path. Role-based limits keep one customer's pricing out of other users' answers. Logging records what was asked.

Can it help with scheduling too?

Yes, in an explanatory way. It shows the impact of a hot job, finds the blocking step on a late job, and highlights material and outside service risks. The schedule is changed in JobBOSS2 by the scheduler.

What size shop is this for?

Typically shops with enough job history to be useful, perhaps a few thousand completed jobs, and several people who quote or schedule. Smaller shops can still benefit, though the similarity results are less rich.

What does it cost to run?

Costs are mainly the project work and a GPU server or workstation, plus small ongoing maintenance. We would size hardware to your user count and model choice, and we avoid per-question public API fees.

Is the built-in JobBOSS2 reporting enough?

For standard reports, often yes. An assistant adds value when people ask ad hoc questions across quotes, jobs, and purchasing that would otherwise require a custom report or a call to the person who knows the system best.

Related guides

JobBOSS2 + precision machining

AI for JobBOSS2 in Precision Machining: Quotes, Routings and Job Cost Answers from Your Own Data

Private AI for JobBOSS2 precision machine shops: quote history, routing actuals, job cost variance and on-time delivery answers, kept on your own network.

Job shop ERP + AI

AI for ECI JobBOSS2 and E2 Shop System

Add AI to ECI JobBOSS2 or E2 Shop System for faster quoting, tighter scheduling, and shop-floor answers, without sending your job data to the cloud.

E2 Shop System + metal fabrication

AI for E2 Shop System in Metal Fabrication: Quote History, Material Yield and Delivery Risk

Private AI for E2 Shop System fabricators: sheet and plate quoting history, nesting yield, welding job costs and delivery risk, answered from your own data.

Metal fabrication + ERP AI

AI for ERP in Metal Fabrication: Nesting, Traceability and Quoting

Private AI on your ERP for fab shops: nesting yield, remnants, MTR and heat traceability, weld procedure records, outside processing and quote turnaround.

RFQ-to-quote + on-prem AI

AI for quote-to-cash in manufacturing and job shop ERPs

AI reads incoming RFQs, drafts quotes from your ERP's own cost and pricing history, and flags parts your shop has never quoted before, keeping the estimator in control.

Epicor Kinetic + job shops

AI for Epicor Kinetic Job Shops: Quote History, Job Variance and Schedule Risk

Private AI for Epicor Kinetic job shops: quote-to-job history, JobHead and JobOper variance, subcontract delays and schedule risk, via REST and BAQs.

Talk it through with an engineer who knows JobBOSS2

Bring one real question your team cannot answer from the ERP today. We will map the data path, the model, and where it runs, and tell you honestly if AI is the wrong tool for it.