Quality & InspectionFree calculatorPDF, Excel, Word exportDiscrete Manufacturing

Expected PPM Out of Specification Calculator

Cp and Cpk are hard to explain to a buyer; parts per million out of tolerance is not. This calculator converts your mean, standard deviation and spec limits into expected PPM for each side, overall yield and the equivalent Cpk.

Your numbers

Use within (short-term) or overall sigma consistently.

Your results

Total expected PPM out of spec
236.07
Expected yield
100%
Z to upper limit
3.5
Z to lower limit
4.5
PPM above USL
232.67
PPM below LSL
3.4
Cpk equivalent
1.1667
Cp
1.3333

Assumes a normal distribution and a stable process. Real tails are often heavier than normal; treat very low PPM as indicative only.

Save results:

Expected PPM as the mean shifts

Sweeps Process mean from 9.95 to 10.05, holding your other inputs fixed.

PPM reporting from ERP

Optional: we can discuss where your ERP holds inspection results and how to report PPM.

Optional. The tool and every export work without this. No spam.

How to use it

Enter the process mean, the standard deviation and the two specification limits in the same units. For one-sided tolerances, put a very wide value for the unused limit, such as a figure ten sigma away. Use the within-subgroup sigma if you want potential short-term PPM, or the overall sigma for what the customer will receive over time. The chart shows how PPM rises as the mean drifts off centre.

  • Same units for all four inputs
  • Enter a far limit for one-sided specs
  • Use overall sigma to forecast what customers see

The method

Each tail is calculated from the standard normal distribution. The upper tail is 1 minus the cumulative probability at Z = (USL - mean) / sigma, and the lower tail is 1 minus the cumulative probability at Z = (mean - LSL) / sigma. Multiply by one million for PPM. Cpk is the smaller Z divided by 3 and Cp is the tolerance width over six sigma. A centred process with Cpk of 1.33 gives about 63 PPM; Cpk of 1.0 gives about 2,700.

Reading the example

With the defaults the process is 0.010 above centre with a sigma of 0.020. Cp is 1.33, but Cpk drops to 1.17 and about 233 PPM falls out of spec, almost all on the upper side. Re-centring to 10.000 brings Cpk back to 1.33, which is why the chart is shaped like a bowl. Centring is often cheaper than reducing variation, so check it before launching a variation project.

Common mistakes

Reporting PPM from a short-term sigma and calling it the field defect rate is optimistic, since drift and tool wear are not in it. Mixing units, such as a mean in millimetres and limits in inches, gives nonsense. Skewed distributions, for example flatness or runout bounded at zero, are not normal and this method will misstate the tail. Use a distribution fit or an empirical count instead.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I convert Cpk to PPM?

For a centred normal process, Z equals 3 times Cpk, and PPM is twice the tail area beyond that Z. Cpk 1.0 is about 2,700 PPM, 1.33 about 63 PPM and 1.67 about 0.6 PPM. This tool does it for off-centre processes too.

What is the difference between Cp and Cpk here?

Cp compares the tolerance width to the process spread and ignores centring. Cpk uses the nearer limit, so it penalises an off-centre mean. A big gap between them means re-centring will help.

Should I add the 1.5 sigma shift?

That is a Six Sigma convention for long-term sigma level reporting, not part of this calculation. If you want it, reduce the effective Z by 1.5 manually or use a sigma level calculator.

Why does the tail PPM look so small?

The normal model decays very quickly. Real processes have outliers from setup errors, material lots and measurement problems that normal theory does not predict, so validate with actual reject counts.

If you want PPM and capability reported per characteristic from your ERP inspection results, we can scope a private, read-only report.