Quality & InspectionFree calculatorPDF, Excel, Word exportDiscrete Manufacturing

Average Total Inspection (ATI) Calculator

A sampling plan looks cheap on paper because you only inspect n pieces. When a lot fails, though, you screen all of it, and that is where the labor goes. ATI tells you the real average workload, which is what you need to size the inspector headcount and quote inspection cost.

Your numbers

units
units
3 %
$/unit

Labor plus gauge time per piece.

lots

Your results

Average total inspection ATI
679.95
Average pieces inspected per lot.
Annual inspection cost
$81,594
Expected defectives in sample
3.75
Probability of acceptance (fraction)
0.4838
Probability of acceptance
48.4%
Share of lot inspected
56.7%
Inspection cost per lot
$408

Poisson approximation. Assumes every rejected lot is inspected 100 percent and that sampling is representative.

Save results:

Pieces inspected per lot (ATI) vs incoming defect rate

Sweeps Incoming percent defective p from 0.2 to 12, holding your other inputs fixed.

Inspection workload from live receipts

Optional: a review of how to forecast inspection labor from your ERP receipts and supplier history.

Optional. The tool and every export work without this. No spam.

How to use it

Enter lot size, the sample size and acceptance number, and the incoming percent defective you expect. Add the cost to inspect one piece and how many lots arrive each year. The tool returns the probability a lot passes, the average pieces inspected per lot, and the annual cost. The chart shows ATI as incoming quality worsens, which is the what-if that matters when a supplier slips.

  • Use supplier history from your ERP for p, not a hopeful target.
  • Cost per piece should include setup and handling, not just gauge time.
  • Compare two plans by running them one after the other.

The ATI formula

ATI = n + (1 - Pa) x (N - n). Every lot gets the sample of n. The share of lots that are rejected, 1 - Pa, also gets the remaining N - n pieces screened. Pa is the probability of finding c or fewer defectives in the sample, computed here from the Poisson sum with m = n x p / 100. At very low p, ATI is almost exactly n. At high p, ATI approaches N and your sampling plan has turned into 100 percent inspection.

Reading the result

With N = 1200, n = 125, c = 3 and p = 3 percent, the sample is expected to hold about 3.75 defectives, so a lot passes only around half the time and ATI is roughly 700 pieces. That is far above 125. The chart shows why: workload rises quickly once p passes the plan's AQL. If annual cost looks too high, the fix is usually supplier quality, not a looser plan.

Common mistakes

People budget inspection labor as n times lots and are surprised in the first bad month. Another mistake is ignoring that screening a rejected lot is often slower per piece than sampling, because it is a rework-style activity. Add a loading factor to the cost per piece for screened lots if that applies to you.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does ATI measure?

Average total inspection is the average number of pieces inspected per lot, counting the sample on every lot plus the full screening of the remainder on lots that are rejected. It is the best single number for sizing inspection labor.

Why is ATI higher than my sample size?

Because rejected lots are screened. Every lot that fails the plan adds N minus n extra pieces. As incoming quality worsens, more lots fail, and ATI climbs toward the full lot size.

Should I use this for destructive tests?

No. Screening a rejected lot is not possible when testing destroys the part. In that case lots are returned or scrapped, and a different cost model applies.

How do I choose p?

Use the average percent defective from your last 6 to 12 months of supplier receipts. Also run the worst realistic month, since staffing has to survive the bad periods as well as the average ones.

Our team can connect this to your inspection lot and receipts data so staffing and cost are forecast from live supplier performance. Ask for a short review.