Condition Monitoring Program Readiness Checklist
Most condition monitoring programs fail not because of sensors but because findings never become work. This checklist walks through scope, data, alarms, work flow and review so you can build or audit a program in a structured way.
0 of 33 items complete
9 critical items still open - these are the highest-risk gaps.
Scope and asset selection
Measurement and data
Alarms and diagnosis
Work flow and follow up
Review and value
Count the items you can tick. Under 50 percent: build the foundations (criticality, baselines, work flow) before buying more sensors. 50 to 80 percent: the program exists, focus on closing the loop. Over 80 percent: tune limits and prove value.
Review your condition monitoring workflow
Optional: send your completed checklist and we can suggest where ERP or CMMS integration would close the gaps.
Optional. The tool and every export work without this. No spam.
How to use the checklist
Work through each group with the reliability engineer, the planner and a technician in the room. Tick only what you can show evidence for, such as a document, a screen or a report. Items marked critical are the ones that most often explain why a program does not deliver. Export the list with your answers to PDF or Excel, then turn the unticked items into actions with owners and dates.
Why scope comes first
Monitoring everything is expensive and dilutes attention. Start with the assets whose failure is costly or dangerous and for which a failure mode gives warning. Condition monitoring only works when there is a P-F interval, meaning a period between the first detectable sign and functional failure. If a failure has no warning, such as a sudden electronic fault, monitoring will not help and a different strategy is needed.
Closing the loop
The value is created when a finding becomes a planned job. That needs a named owner, a link from the finding to a work request in the CMMS or ERP, and parts and time to act. Review overdue findings monthly. Also record what was found during the repair, because that feedback is how analysts improve their calls and how you prove the savings.
Common mistakes
Buying instruments before ranking assets, taking readings with no baseline, using one set of limits for every machine, and reporting findings by email with no work request are the common failures. Another is measuring on a fixed interval longer than the P-F interval, which guarantees missed failures.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where should I start with condition monitoring?
Start with a criticality ranking and the failure modes of the top assets. Then pick the cheapest technique that detects each failure mode early enough, set baselines, and make sure a named person turns findings into work requests.
How many assets should be on a route?
It depends on the techniques and staff. A common start is the top 10 to 20 percent of assets by criticality. Expand only when findings are being closed on time and the data quality is good.
Do I need online sensors or are manual routes enough?
Manual routes are enough for many slow-developing faults with a long P-F interval. Online sensors suit critical, fast-developing or hard-to-reach assets, or sites with few skilled staff. Many programs use both.
How do I show the program is worth the cost?
Record each avoided failure with the downtime hours, repair cost difference and any scrap or safety impact avoided. Compare the total with the program cost over the same period. Use only confirmed catches.
If your ERP or CMMS holds the asset and work order history, we can help connect findings to requests and report coverage automatically. Ask for an expert review.
Related Tools
Predictive Maintenance Data Readiness Assessment
Ten questions that show whether your asset data, failure history and sensor coverage can support predictive maintenance, and what to fix first.
Maintenance & ReliabilityCondition Monitoring Alarm SQL Query Generator
Fill in your table and column names and get SQL that finds sensor readings over limits and flags assets with no open work order.
Maintenance & ReliabilityVibration Fault Signature Diagnosis Reference
A searchable lookup of what each common machine fault looks like in a vibration spectrum, with dominant frequency, direction and the first check to make.
Maintenance & ReliabilityCondition Monitoring Finding and Recommendation Report Template
A one-page report your analyst can send to the planner: what was measured, what it means, how urgent it is and what to do.
Discrete ManufacturingPredictive Maintenance ROI Calculator
Compare baseline unplanned downtime cost against predictive maintenance monitoring cost to see net annual savings across your asset fleet.
More Maintenance & Reliability tools
See all- TPM Autonomous Maintenance CIL Standard Template
- ISO 4406 Oil Cleanliness Code Reference
- Infrared Thermography Severity and Emissivity Reference
- Condition Monitoring Trend and Time-to-Alarm Python Script Generator
- MTBF and MTTR Worksheet
- TPM Autonomous Maintenance Standard Template
- TPM Pillars and Autonomous Maintenance 7 Steps Reference
- Preventive Maintenance Schedule Template
- Maintenance Work Order Template