Maintenance & ReliabilityFree checklistPDF, Excel, Word exportDiscrete Manufacturing

Condition Monitoring Program Readiness Checklist

Most condition monitoring programs fail not because of sensors but because findings never become work. This checklist walks through scope, data, alarms, work flow and review so you can build or audit a program in a structured way.

0%

0 of 33 items complete

9 critical items still open - these are the highest-risk gaps.

Download checklist:

Scope and asset selection

Measurement and data

Alarms and diagnosis

Work flow and follow up

Review and value

Count the items you can tick. Under 50 percent: build the foundations (criticality, baselines, work flow) before buying more sensors. 50 to 80 percent: the program exists, focus on closing the loop. Over 80 percent: tune limits and prove value.

Review your condition monitoring workflow

Optional: send your completed checklist and we can suggest where ERP or CMMS integration would close the gaps.

Optional. The tool and every export work without this. No spam.

How to use the checklist

Work through each group with the reliability engineer, the planner and a technician in the room. Tick only what you can show evidence for, such as a document, a screen or a report. Items marked critical are the ones that most often explain why a program does not deliver. Export the list with your answers to PDF or Excel, then turn the unticked items into actions with owners and dates.

Why scope comes first

Monitoring everything is expensive and dilutes attention. Start with the assets whose failure is costly or dangerous and for which a failure mode gives warning. Condition monitoring only works when there is a P-F interval, meaning a period between the first detectable sign and functional failure. If a failure has no warning, such as a sudden electronic fault, monitoring will not help and a different strategy is needed.

Closing the loop

The value is created when a finding becomes a planned job. That needs a named owner, a link from the finding to a work request in the CMMS or ERP, and parts and time to act. Review overdue findings monthly. Also record what was found during the repair, because that feedback is how analysts improve their calls and how you prove the savings.

Common mistakes

Buying instruments before ranking assets, taking readings with no baseline, using one set of limits for every machine, and reporting findings by email with no work request are the common failures. Another is measuring on a fixed interval longer than the P-F interval, which guarantees missed failures.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where should I start with condition monitoring?

Start with a criticality ranking and the failure modes of the top assets. Then pick the cheapest technique that detects each failure mode early enough, set baselines, and make sure a named person turns findings into work requests.

How many assets should be on a route?

It depends on the techniques and staff. A common start is the top 10 to 20 percent of assets by criticality. Expand only when findings are being closed on time and the data quality is good.

Do I need online sensors or are manual routes enough?

Manual routes are enough for many slow-developing faults with a long P-F interval. Online sensors suit critical, fast-developing or hard-to-reach assets, or sites with few skilled staff. Many programs use both.

How do I show the program is worth the cost?

Record each avoided failure with the downtime hours, repair cost difference and any scrap or safety impact avoided. Compare the total with the program cost over the same period. Use only confirmed catches.

If your ERP or CMMS holds the asset and work order history, we can help connect findings to requests and report coverage automatically. Ask for an expert review.