Infor LN Session Test Script Template (UAT)
User acceptance testing fails when scripts are vague. This template structures each LN test with prerequisites, numbered steps, expected and actual results and a sign-off, so testers record evidence and defects can be traced.
Fill in
Infor LN Session Test Script Template
Test Script UAT-SLS-007
Project: LN upgrade 2026 Process: Sales order entry to delivery Environment: TEST-01, company 100 Tester: Customer service lead Date: 2026-11-09
Prerequisites and Test Data
Customer CUST-1001 with credit limit set. Item ITM-5001 in stock in warehouse W01. Tester has the sales order role.
Test Steps
| Step | Action | Expected result | Actual result | Pass / Fail |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Create a sales order for 10 units of ITM-5001 | |||
| 2 | Approve the order and check the price | |||
| 3 | Release to warehousing and confirm the outbound order exists | |||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 |
Overall Expected Result
Order is created at the contract price, passes credit check, and an outbound order is generated for the correct warehouse.
Defects Raised
| Defect ID | Step | Severity | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
Sign-off
Write steps in business language and reference the session or screen name used in your system. Keep one script per process path, not per screen.
UAT pack
Optional: ask for a short guide on structuring UAT cycles and exit criteria for an LN project.
Optional. The tool and every export work without this. No spam.
How to use the template
Give each script an ID and name the process, not the session, in the title. List the data and roles the tester needs, since a failed prerequisite is the most common false defect. Write each step as an action a key user can perform and an expected result they can verify. Export to PDF for the test record, or to Word if testers will annotate by hand. After execution, add the actual result and a pass or fail per step, and log any defect with severity.
- One script per business scenario
- State test data explicitly, with real codes
- Make expected results observable
- Record actual results, not just ticks
What to test in an LN project
Cover the end-to-end flows that run the business: order to cash, procure to pay, plan to produce and record to report. Include the customized objects from your inventory, interfaces and integrations, key reports, authorizations by role, and period-end routines. Add negative cases such as a blocked customer or a missing price, because users meet those every day. Where you changed behavior with scripts or DAL hooks, add a case that triggers the hook and one that should not.
Defects and exit criteria
Agree severity levels before testing starts. A common approach is to treat any defect that blocks a business process or posts wrong values as critical, and require zero open critical defects and an agreed small number of minor ones to exit. Record who accepts each deferred defect. Keep the evidence, because a sign-off is only as good as the record behind it.
Common mistakes
Scripts often assume the tester knows the system, so steps are skipped and results are subjective. Test data is another weak spot: if data is refreshed between cycles the script silently stops working. Finally, teams run scripts as a technical exercise rather than letting the people who do the job run them, which defeats the purpose of acceptance testing.
Frequently Asked Questions
How detailed should the steps be?
Detailed enough that a trained key user who did not write the script can follow it without asking. Name the session or screen, the key values to enter and what they should see after each step.
How many scripts do I need?
That depends on scope. A common approach is a script per business scenario and role, so a mid-size LN project often has dozens. Prioritize high-risk and high-volume processes first.
Who should execute UAT?
The business users who run the process daily, supported by a test lead and a functional consultant. Developers should fix defects, not accept their own work.
Can I reuse the script for regression testing?
Yes. Keep scripts versioned, update the data after each refresh and rerun the critical ones before every upgrade or major change.
If test preparation is a bottleneck, we can talk about generating draft scripts from your process documents and configuration with a private model, reviewed by your key users.
Related Tools
Infor LN Go-Live Readiness Checklist
Go or no-go checklist for an LN implementation, upgrade or Baan migration, with critical items flagged.
Infor LN & BaanInfor LN Change Request Form Template
Fill-in change request form for LN and Baan changes, covering scope, impact, testing, rollback and sign-off.
Infor LN & BaanInfor LN Cutover Runbook Template
Editable task-by-task cutover plan with owners, durations, dependencies and total cutover hours.
Infor LN & BaanInfor LN and Baan Customization Inventory Worksheet
Editable worksheet to list every Baan or LN customization with type, owner, effort and a retire, keep or replace decision.
More Infor LN & Baan tools
See all- Infor LN Session and Module Code Reference
- Infor LN Production Order Status and Lifecycle Reference
- Infor LN 4GL Session Script Template
- Infor LN Company and Enterprise Unit Design Worksheet
- Infor LN DAL Hook Review Checklist
- Infor LN Warehousing Order Origins and Types Reference
- Infor LN Table Name and SQL Query Builder
- Infor LN Regression Test Effort Calculator
- Baan to Infor LN Data Conversion Mapping Worksheet