Process FMEA Failure Mode Library: Common Failure Modes, Effects and Causes by Process
Starting a PFMEA from a blank sheet wastes the first meeting. This library lists failure modes that recur across common manufacturing processes, with the effect they usually have and the causes that most often turn out to be real. Search by process or keyword, then copy the relevant lines into your own FMEA.
| Process | Typical step | Potential failure mode | Typical effect | Typical causes to test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machining | Turning or milling a critical diameter | Dimension oversize | Rework, or scrap if no material left; fit or function failure | Tool offset error, insert wear, program error |
Machining | Turning or milling a critical diameter | Dimension undersize | Scrap; loose fit downstream | Wrong offset, thermal growth, tool breakage mid-cycle |
Machining | Finish pass | Surface finish out of specification | Seal leak path, wear, customer rejection | Dull insert, wrong feed or speed, coolant issue |
Machining | Edge break | Burr remains | Assembly damage, operator injury, contamination | No deburr step, worn tool, inconsistent manual deburring |
Machining | Fixture load | Feature in wrong location | Scrap; interference at assembly | Part loaded in wrong orientation, fixture wear, wrong work offset |
Drilling | Drill and tap | Hole missing or incomplete | Assembly stop, wrong or missing fastener | Broken drill, program skip, no tool breakage detection |
Drilling | Drill and tap | Hole position out of tolerance | Fit failure, fastener cannot be installed | Spindle runout, fixture movement, drill walk |
Welding | Arc weld | Porosity | Reduced joint strength, leak | Shielding gas flow, contaminated base metal, damp filler |
Welding | Arc weld | Lack of fusion | Joint failure in service | Low heat input, travel speed too high, wrong joint prep |
Welding | Arc weld | Burn-through | Scrap, leak | Excess current, gap too large, thin material |
Welding | Fixture and weld sequence | Distortion | Dimensional nonconformance, assembly interference | Heat input, wrong weld sequence, insufficient clamping |
Heat treat | Furnace cycle | Hardness out of range | Premature wear or brittle fracture | Wrong recipe, load density, furnace temperature drift |
Plating or coating | Bath process | Insufficient coating thickness | Corrosion, early field failure | Bath chemistry, dwell time, current density, masking error |
Plating or coating | Pretreatment | Poor adhesion | Peeling or flaking | Inadequate cleaning, contaminated rinse, expired chemistry |
Painting | Spray application | Runs or sags | Cosmetic rejection, rework | Film build too heavy, viscosity, booth temperature |
Injection molding | Fill and pack | Short shot | Incomplete part, scrap | Low shot size or pressure, blocked vent, cold material |
Injection molding | Clamp and eject | Flash | Assembly interference, cosmetic reject | Worn tool parting line, insufficient clamp tonnage |
Injection molding | Pack and cool | Sink marks or warpage | Cosmetic or fit failure | Insufficient packing, short cooling time, uneven wall thickness |
Casting | Pour and solidify | Shrinkage porosity | Leak, reduced strength | Gating design, pour temperature, insufficient feeding |
Stamping | Press stroke | Burr or crack at edge | Operator injury risk, downstream fracture | Die clearance, worn punch, material grade variation |
Stamping | Press stroke | Wrinkle or springback | Fit failure at assembly | Blank holder force, material properties, die wear |
Assembly | Component selection | Wrong component installed | Functional failure, recall exposure | Similar part numbers, mixed bins, no poka-yoke |
Assembly | Component placement | Component missing | Function not delivered; field return | Operator omission, no presence check, kit shortage |
Assembly | Fastening | Fastener under-torqued | Loosening in service | Tool out of calibration, operator bypass, wrong torque setting |
Assembly | Fastening | Fastener over-torqued | Stripped thread or cracked part | Tool setting, no torque verification, lubricant variation |
Assembly | Component placement | Part installed in wrong orientation | Function failure or damage on power-up | Symmetrical part design, no keying feature |
Assembly | Cleanliness | Foreign object debris or contamination | Functional failure, hydraulic or optical contamination | Open containers, chips not removed, poor housekeeping |
SMT | Solder paste print | Insufficient or excess solder paste | Open joint or solder bridge | Stencil wear or blockage, squeegee pressure, paste age |
SMT | Reflow | Tombstoning | Open circuit on small passives | Uneven pad heating, pad size imbalance, placement offset |
SMT | Pick and place | Component misaligned or missing | Open or short, functional failure | Nozzle wear, feeder error, vision calibration |
SMT | Pick and place | Wrong polarity or wrong value | Board failure, possible damage | Feeder loaded wrong, wrong reel, program error |
Cable assembly | Crimp | Crimp height out of specification | Intermittent connection or pull-out | Worn crimp tool, wrong die, wire strand damage |
Cable assembly | Insertion into housing | Wire in wrong cavity | Circuit mis-wire, system malfunction | Manual routing, no continuity test, ambiguous drawing |
Packaging | Labeling | Wrong or unreadable label | Shipping error, loss of traceability | Wrong label stock, printer fault, no scan verification |
Packaging | Pack and ship | Damage in transit | Customer rejection, claims | Inadequate dunnage, wrong carton, stacking height |
Test and inspection | Measurement | Gauge out of calibration | Escaped nonconforming parts or false rejects | Missed calibration due date, handling damage |
Test and inspection | Functional test | Wrong test program revision | Defects not detected | Revision control gap, local copies, no checksum or lock |
Receiving | Incoming inspection | Nonconforming material accepted | Downstream scrap or field failure | Missing certificate check, sampling plan too loose, label mix-up |
These are starting prompts for a team brainstorm, not a complete or validated list for your product. Remove what does not apply, add what your history shows, and rate each retained line with your own severity, occurrence and detection criteria.
Build an FMEA starter list from your ERP history
Optional: we can show how NCR, scrap and rework data in your ERP can seed failure modes automatically.
Optional. The tool and every export work without this. No spam.
How to use the library
Filter by the process step you are analysing, for example SMT or welding. Read each failure mode aloud with the team and ask a single question: could this happen on our line, with our equipment and our part? Keep the lines that pass and delete the rest. Then rewrite each retained line in your own words, tied to your specific part number, operation and characteristic. A generic line such as dimension oversize becomes more useful once it names the feature, the tolerance and the operation number.
- Use the process column to match the step on your process flow diagram
- Treat the cause column as hypotheses to verify, not conclusions
- Add failure modes from your own NCR, scrap and warranty history
- Never copy a line without rating it for your own process
Failure mode, effect and cause: keep them separate
A failure mode is how the process step could fail to deliver its requirement. The effect is what the next operation, the end customer or the regulator would experience. The cause is why the failure mode happens. Teams often mix these, writing scrap as a failure mode when it is an effect, or worn tool as a mode when it is a cause. The AIAG and VDA FMEA Handbook organises the analysis as a failure chain of effect, mode and cause, and rating each link separately keeps severity, occurrence and detection honest.
Where the library helps and where it does not
It helps with completeness: it prompts modes a team may overlook, such as FOD, wrong revision of a test program or a missing presence check. It does not know your tolerances, your customer-specific requirements or your process capability. A library line also says nothing about severity, which depends on your product and its end use. Safety and regulatory effects must be rated by people who know the application. Use the output as a checklist of questions, and let your own data decide which lines matter.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this list a complete PFMEA?
No. It is a prompt list for brainstorming. A real PFMEA is specific to your part, process steps, equipment and customer requirements, and every retained line must be rated for severity, occurrence and detection by your own cross-functional team.
Can I export the table to Excel?
Yes. The reference table exports to Excel, CSV, PDF and Word. A common approach is to export the rows you need, paste them into your FMEA template and then rewrite them to match your specific operations.
Where should I get real failure modes from?
From your own data first: nonconformance reports, scrap and rework codes, customer returns, warranty claims and lessons learned from similar parts. Industry libraries come second, and they never replace history from your own line.
Does this cover design FMEA?
No, this list is about manufacturing process steps. A DFMEA analyses how a product function could fail by design, which needs a different set of prompts based on the product structure and its functions.
If your NCR, scrap and rework history lives in your ERP, Netray can help pull real failure modes and counts from it so your FMEA starts from evidence rather than memory.
Related Tools
FMEA Prevention and Detection Controls Reference
A searchable list of common prevention and detection controls, with what each addresses and where it falls short, for use when completing FMEA and control plan columns.
Quality & InspectionRisk Analysis Method Selection Reference
A searchable comparison of risk and reliability analysis methods, showing whether each works bottom-up or top-down, what it suits and which standard describes it.
Quality & InspectionFMEA Process Maturity Assessment
Ten questions that score how well your organisation runs FMEA, from team and scope to rating discipline, action closure and linkage to the control plan.
Quality & InspectionFMEA Recommended Action Closure Checklist
A checklist to confirm an FMEA action is implemented, verified with evidence, re-rated honestly and carried into controls and documents before it is closed.
More Quality & Inspection tools
See all- A3 Problem Solving Report Template
- Rolled Throughput Yield Calculator
- A3 Problem Solving Template
- Rolled Throughput Yield Calculator
- Cpk Confidence Interval and Sample Size Calculator
- X-bar and S Control Chart Limits Calculator
- Individuals and Moving Range (I-MR) Chart Limits Calculator
- Expected PPM Out of Specification Calculator
- Taguchi Loss Function Calculator