Quality & InspectionFree assessmentPDF, Excel, Word export

FMEA Process Maturity Assessment: Is Your FMEA a Living Document or a Paper Exercise?

Most plants have FMEAs. Far fewer have an FMEA process that actually changes what happens on the line. Answer ten questions about your team, ratings, action follow-up and feedback loops to see where your process sits and what to fix first.

0 of 10 answered0%

1. Who builds your FMEAs?

2. How is the scope defined before analysis starts?

3. Where do failure modes come from?

4. How are severity, occurrence and detection rated?

5. How do you decide which risks need action?

6. How well are recommended actions followed through?

7. How are the FMEA and the control plan connected?

8. When is the FMEA updated?

9. How do field failures and internal escapes feed back?

10. How is the FMEA data stored and searched?

How to use the assessment

Answer based on what happens in practice across your last several FMEAs, not on what the procedure says. If practice differs by product line, answer for the weakest line that matters, or run the assessment once per site. Each answer scores from zero to three, and the total is shown as a percentage, with a band and a short list of next steps. Use it as a conversation starter with your quality team rather than a formal audit score.

What the questions test

The ten questions follow the life of an FMEA: who builds it, how scope is defined, where failure modes come from, how ratings are made, how risk is prioritised, how actions are closed, how the sheet connects to the control plan, when it is updated, how escapes feed back and how the data is stored. They draw on the structure of the AIAG and VDA FMEA Handbook, which describes planning, structure, function and failure analysis, risk analysis, optimization and results documentation as steps.

  • Team and scope: questions 1 and 2
  • Evidence and rating: questions 3 and 4
  • Prioritisation and follow-through: questions 5 and 6
  • Linkage and feedback: questions 7, 8 and 9
  • Storage and search: question 10

Reading your result

A low score is common and not a reason for blame. It usually means the FMEA is treated as a deliverable for the customer. Pick the two lowest-scoring areas and improve those first; fixing action follow-up and the control plan link tends to give the fastest return. A high score is no guarantee of quality, so back the self-assessment with a review of two or three real FMEAs against the checklist in the related tools.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this assessment an audit?

No. It is a self-assessment to start a discussion. Audits against IATF 16949, AS9100 or customer requirements need evidence review of real records, and may reach different conclusions.

Why does the assessment ask about severity 9 and 10?

Because ranking by RPN alone can hide the highest-consequence items. Many customers and the AIAG-VDA approach expect that safety and regulatory effects are reviewed regardless of the overall number.

How often should we run it?

Annually is reasonable, or after major quality escapes. Compare scores over time and by site rather than reading a single number in isolation.

What should we fix first?

In most plants, action follow-through and the link between FMEA and control plan give the best return. Both are inexpensive to improve and are routinely checked in customer audits.

If your FMEA data is scattered across spreadsheets, QMS and ERP, Netray can discuss approaches for making it searchable without a large migration project.