Engineering & PLMFree referencePDF, Excel, Word exportMetal Finishing

Electrochemical Equivalents and Plating Efficiency Reference Table

Every plating calculation starts with the same handful of constants. This reference collects atomic weight, valence, density, electrochemical equivalent and typical efficiency for the metals shops plate, so you can feed them into time, thickness and cost estimates.

Download:
MetalTypical bathAtomic weight (g/mol)Valence (n)Density (g/cm3)Electrochemical equivalent (g/Ah at 100%)um per hour per A/dm2 at 100%Typical cathode efficiency
Copper
Acid sulfate
63.55
2
8.96
1.1856
13.232
95 to 100%
Copper
Alkaline cyanide (strike)
63.55
1
8.96
2.3712
26.4641
30 to 60%
Nickel
Watts / sulfamate
58.69
2
8.9
1.0949
12.3025
93 to 98%
Zinc
Acid chloride
65.38
2
7.14
1.2197
17.0831
92 to 98%
Zinc
Alkaline non-cyanide
65.38
2
7.14
1.2197
17.0831
50 to 80%
Zinc
Cyanide
65.38
2
7.14
1.2197
17.0831
60 to 90%
Cadmium
Cyanide
112.41
2
8.65
2.0971
24.2442
85 to 95%
Tin
Acid sulfate
118.71
2
7.31
2.2147
30.2963
90 to 100%
Chromium
Hexavalent hard chrome
52
6
7.19
0.3234
4.4975
10 to 15%
Silver
Cyanide
107.87
1
10.49
4.0248
38.3684
95 to 100%
Gold
Cyanide (acid or neutral also used)
196.97
1
19.32
7.3494
38.0401
30 to 90%, varies widely
Iron
Ferrous chloride / sulfate
55.85
2
7.87
1.0419
13.2394
90 to 98%
Lead
Fluoborate
207.2
2
11.34
3.8655
34.0875
95 to 100%
Palladium
Ammoniacal / chloride
106.42
2
12.02
1.9854
16.5173
90 to 100%
Rhodium
Sulfate / phosphate
102.91
3
12.41
1.2799
10.3137
30 to 70%
Platinum
Phosphate / sulfate
195.08
4
21.45
1.8197
8.4835
10 to 50%

Electrochemical equivalent is atomic weight divided by (valence x 26.801 Ah/mol) and the last two numeric columns are computed from the first three. Efficiency ranges are typical literature values for guidance; actual efficiency depends on bath composition, temperature, current density and condition, so use your own measured value. Alloy and electroless deposits are not covered.

Process data in one place

Want plating constants, bath logs and routings searchable together? We can discuss how a private assistant could help.

Optional. The tool and every export work without this. No spam.

How to use the table

Search for the metal or bath, then read atomic weight, valence and density into the Faraday plating calculator. The electrochemical equivalent column gives grams per ampere-hour at 100 percent efficiency, and the rate column gives micrometers of deposit per hour for each A/dm2, also at 100 percent. Multiply by your current density and measured efficiency to get real deposition rate. Export the table to Excel to use in your own estimating sheets.

  • Use valence that matches the bath chemistry, not just the metal
  • Multiply by cathode efficiency before using rates
  • Check density against your own deposit measurements
  • Search by metal or bath name

Where the numbers come from

Atomic weights and densities are standard handbook values for the pure metal. Valence is the number of electrons per deposited atom for the bath type: copper is 2 in acid sulfate but 1 from cuprous cyanide, and chromium is 6 in hexavalent baths. One mole of electrons equals 96,485 coulombs, which is 26.801 ampere-hours. The electrochemical equivalent is atomic weight / (n x 26.801).

Reading efficiency ranges

Efficiency is the fraction of current that deposits metal rather than evolving hydrogen. Acid copper, nickel, tin and acid zinc are close to 100 percent, so Faraday calculations are accurate. Hard chrome sits around 10 to 15 percent, so time estimates must include efficiency or they are off by a factor of seven or more. Alkaline zinc and gold vary with composition and current density, so measure them.

Common mistakes

Frequent errors are using the wrong valence for cyanide copper or gold, applying 100 percent efficiency to chrome, and treating alloys such as zinc-nickel as pure zinc. Deposit density can also be lower than handbook values, particularly for bright or porous deposits. Calibrate against measured thickness on a coupon.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the electrochemical equivalent of nickel?

For divalent nickel it is 58.69 / (2 x 26.801), or about 1.095 grams per ampere-hour at 100 percent efficiency. At 95 percent efficiency the effective deposit is about 1.04 g per Ah.

Why is the valence of copper different between baths?

Acid copper sulfate contains Cu(II), which takes two electrons per atom, while copper cyanide baths deposit from Cu(I) with one electron per atom. The same current deposits twice as much copper from the acid bath, ignoring efficiency.

What is the Faraday constant in ampere-hours?

One Faraday is 96,485 coulombs per mole of electrons, equal to 26.801 ampere-hours. It is the number used to convert between current and moles of metal deposited.

Are the efficiency numbers guaranteed?

No. They are typical ranges. Real efficiency depends on bath composition, temperature, current density, agitation and bath age. Measure it with a coulometer or by weighing a test panel for production calculations.

If you maintain process data for plating baths in spreadsheets or an ERP, we can help build a private assistant that returns the right constants and estimates directly from your routings.

Keep exploring

Free tools

Guides

Manufacturing hubs