Supply Chain & InventoryFree worksheetPDF, Excel, Word exportMedical Devices

ISO 13485 Approved Supplier List Risk Ranking and Audit Plan Worksheet

Auditors do not expect every supplier to be treated the same. They expect your controls to be proportional to risk and documented. This worksheet ranks suppliers with a simple risk priority number, assigns audit intervals, and tells you what the resulting audit schedule costs.

Download:
SupplierProduct or service suppliedCategorySeverity if it fails (1-5)Occurrence (1-5)Detectability (1-5)Risk priority numberAudit interval (months)Audits per yearCost per auditAnnual audit cost
40
1
$2,400
50
1
$3,200
24
0.5
$900
36
0.5
$900
9
0.3333
$400
2
0
$0
Highest risk priority number
50
Audits per year
3.3333
Annual audit budget
$7,800
Suppliers on list
6
Average risk priority number
26.8333
Audit cost per listed supplier
$1,300

Scores and example suppliers are illustrative. ISO 13485 clause 7.4.1 requires supplier evaluation criteria proportionate to the risk of the product and its effect on the device, so define the 1 to 5 scales in your own procedure. A supplier with an interval of 0 is not audited and is controlled by other means, such as questionnaires or incoming inspection.

Drive supplier risk from real performance data

Optional: we can compute occurrence scores from your receiving, NCR and delivery history in the ERP.

Optional. The tool and every export work without this. No spam.

How to use it

List each supplier on your approved supplier list with what they provide and a category. Score severity (effect on device safety or performance if the item fails), occurrence (history of nonconformance, complexity, change frequency) and detectability (how likely you are to catch a problem at incoming inspection). The sheet multiplies them into a risk priority number. Set an audit interval for each supplier, enter an expected cost per audit, and the sheet gives audits per year and annual cost.

  • Document the meaning of scores 1 to 5 in your supplier control procedure
  • Rescore suppliers after any nonconformance, change notice or audit finding
  • Use detectability honestly: sealed or validated processes score high
  • Record the rationale for any interval that does not follow the ranking

Method and regulatory basis

ISO 13485:2016 clause 7.4.1 requires criteria for evaluation and selection of suppliers that are proportionate to the risk of the medical device and the supplier's ability to provide conforming product. Clause 4.1.5 requires control of outsourced processes, and clause 7.4.3 requires verification of purchased product. The severity, occurrence and detectability scoring borrows the FMEA risk priority approach familiar from ISO 14971 practice and quality tools. It is a prioritization aid, not a statistical measure, so keep the scales short and well defined.

Reading the results

Sort the list by risk priority number and compare it to the assigned intervals. High-ranking suppliers with long intervals, or low-ranking suppliers audited annually, are the first things a reviewer will question. The annual cost total helps you plan travel and auditor capacity, and shows when a remote audit or a third-party certificate such as an ISO 13485 or ISO 17025 accreditation can supplement an on-site audit for lower-risk suppliers. Review the table at least annually and at management review.

Common mistakes

Scoring everything as critical makes the ranking useless, and scoring based on spend rather than effect on the device misses small but important suppliers like a calibration lab or a sterilizer. Another mistake is to treat a supplier's certificate as a replacement for your own evaluation. A certificate is evidence, not a substitute for judgment. Finally, remember that suppliers on the list also need agreements that require notice of changes, which is part of risk control.

Frequently Asked Questions

How often should I audit ISO 13485 suppliers?

ISO 13485 does not set a fixed interval. It requires a risk-proportionate approach. Many companies audit critical suppliers annually or every two years and use questionnaires, certificates and performance data for lower-risk suppliers. Document your rationale.

Is a risk priority number required?

No. It is one common way to rank suppliers. Any documented, risk-based method is acceptable, including a simple critical, major and minor classification, provided it is applied consistently and reviewed.

Do distributors and calibration labs go on the list?

Yes, if they affect product quality or the quality system. Calibration labs, sterilizers, test labs and packaging suppliers are often more significant than a component supplier, so include them and score them on the effect of failure.

Can a supplier certificate replace an audit?

It can reduce the audit scope or frequency for lower-risk suppliers if you review the certificate scope and keep evidence. For critical suppliers, most manufacturers still audit directly or through a qualified third party.

If your supplier performance, audit and quality data sits across ERP, email and spreadsheets, we can consolidate it so risk scores are driven by actual receiving and NCR history.

Keep exploring

Free tools

ERP fixes and how-tos

Guides

AI on your ERP

Manufacturing hubs