OracleFree templatePDF, Excel, Word exportOracle Fusion Cloud SCM

Oracle Fusion SCM Implementation Statement of Work Template

Most Oracle Fusion SCM overruns trace back to an unclear statement of work. This fill-in outline captures scope, phases, responsibilities and acceptance in plain terms so both sides agree before work starts.

Fill in

Client

Implementation partner

Effective date

In-scope modules

Sites in scope

Target go-live

Commercial model

Mock data loads

Client resources committed

Out of scope

Live preview

Free, optional. Reopen it on any device.

Download:

Oracle Fusion SCM Implementation Statement of Work Template

Statement of Work: Oracle Fusion Cloud SCM Implementation

Client: Acme Precision Ltd Implementation partner: Example Consulting LLC Effective date: 2026-11-02 Commercial model: Fixed price by phase

1. Purpose and scope

This statement of work describes services to implement Oracle Fusion Cloud SCM for Acme Precision Ltd.

In-scope modules: Inventory Management, Procurement, Order Management, Manufacturing, Cost Management

Sites in scope: Two manufacturing plants and one distribution center

Target go-live: 2027-04-05

2. Phases and deliverables

Phase	Key activities	Deliverables
Initiate	Kickoff, governance, environment access	Project plan, RAID log
Design	Process workshops, fit gap, security design	Signed fit gap and solution design
Build	Configuration, extensions, integrations	Configured test environment
Data	Mapping, cleansing, 3 mock loads	Load results and reconciliations
Test	System test and user acceptance test	Signed test scripts
Deploy	Cutover rehearsal, go-live, hypercare	Cutover runbook, hypercare exit report

3. Client responsibilities

Project manager at 100 percent, one functional lead per module at 50 percent, one data owner per object.

The client provides timely decisions, access to subject matter experts and ownership of source data quality.

4. Out of scope

Custom extensions not listed in the signed fit gap, legacy data archiving, end user classroom training beyond train-the-trainer.

Anything not listed above is handled through change control.

5. Assumptions

Oracle subscriptions and environments are provided by the client. Source data is available in a structured form by the agreed date. Scope changes follow the change control procedure.

6. Acceptance

Each deliverable is reviewed within an agreed number of business days. Acceptance is recorded in writing. Deliverables not rejected with reasons in that period are treated as accepted.

Approvals

Client sponsor / Date

Implementation partner / Date

Client project manager / Date

This is a starting point, not legal advice. Have counsel review it and align it with your master services agreement before signing.

Want an independent scope review?

Optional review of your statement of work, assumptions and data migration effort.

Optional. The tool and every export work without this. No spam.

Was this tool useful?

How to use the template

Enter the client, partner, modules, sites and commercial model. Review the phase table and edit the deliverables to match what you will actually deliver. List client responsibilities as concretely as the provider's, because delays on the client side are the usual source of disputes. Export to Word to merge into your master agreement.

Scope clarity

List modules, sites, legal entities, languages and integrations. State how many mock loads, test cycles and training sessions are included, since these drive effort. Write out of scope as clearly as in scope. If extensions are expected, reference the signed fit gap as the baseline rather than describing them loosely.

Name modules and sites
Count loads and test cycles
Link extensions to the fit gap
List integrations individually

Commercial models

Fixed price by phase gives cost certainty but needs precise scope and change control. Time and materials with a cap shares risk and suits uncertain scope. Pure time and materials is flexible but needs strong governance. Whatever model you choose, define how change requests are raised, estimated and approved.

Common mistakes

Leaving acceptance criteria vague, forgetting data migration effort, and not committing client resources by role and percentage. Another is describing the target process rather than the services. Keep the statement of work about what the partner does and delivers, and use the solution design for how the system will work.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this a legal contract?

No. It is a generic outline to help structure scope discussions. It is not legal advice. Have counsel review the final document and align it with your master agreement, liability terms and local law.

How detailed should the deliverables be?

Detailed enough that someone can tell whether each was delivered. Name the document or outcome, the format and the approver. Vague deliverables such as 'configuration' become disputes at acceptance time.

Who is responsible for data quality?

The client owns the source data and its correctness. The partner supplies mapping, tools and load support. State this clearly with a named data owner per object so errors do not become scope disputes.

How are changes handled?

Through a written change request that describes the change, the effect on cost and schedule, and the approver. Nothing outside scope should start without approval, even for small items.

If you want an independent view of an SCM statement of work, we can review scope, assumptions and data migration effort against your legacy ERP.

Talk to an Expert Explore More Free Tools